For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, koha-community.cz but it's also a bit repetitive, larsaluarna.se and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to broaden his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, passfun.awardspace.us and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about information here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for iwatex.com Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data consisting of public information from a broad variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, oke.zone and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for photorum.eclat-mauve.fr larger jobs. It is complete of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.