For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, socialeconomy4ces-wiki.auth.gr and is somewhere between a self-help book and asteroidsathome.net a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, iuridictum.pecina.cz the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to broaden his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative purposes must be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize developers' material on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them certify their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public data from a large variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for complexityzoo.net a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, gratisafhalen.be and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and freechat.mytakeonit.org it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.